HomeoldNARAL PLOTS NATIONAL STRATEGY TARGETING WOMEN HELPING CENTERS

NARAL PLOTS NATIONAL STRATEGY TARGETING WOMEN HELPING CENTERS

Published on

Today’s last-in-the-queue story for National Right to Life News Today borrows from Part Five where CareNet talks about a remarkably revealing YouTube video posted less than a week ago by NARAL Pro-Choice New York .

I would encourage you to take the seven minutes to watch NARAL brag about how it has created a “model” that other cities can adopt to harass women helping centers in urban areas. They planned what they were going to do at two meetings and then went forth to try to duplicate what was then brewing in the city of Baltimore.

There is a passing allusion at the end by a pro-abortion legal defense fund that such laws are no doubt constitutional. Well, in fact, Baltimore’s anti-pregnancy law was overturned in January by federal judge Marvin J. Garbis.

Montgomery County, Maryland’s City Council passed a kindred law. In March Judge Deborah Chasanow enjoined the Council from enforcing a part of Resolution No. 16-1252, passed February 1, 2010, until all the legal issues in Centro Tepeyac v. Montgomery County are resolved.

Adding urgency to the case is that the Montgomery County law would fine violators $500 for the first day, and $750 for each day thereafter.

That didn’t prevent the New York City Council from passing a similar law which is also being challenged in court.

The bottom line comes in the stirring opinion handed down by U.S. District Court Judge Marvin J. Garbis. Garbis overturned the city of Baltimore’s law, which the Baltimore Sun said was introduced “at the behest of Planned Parenthood, a pro-choice organization that hopes the Baltimore legislation will serve as a model for a national effort.”  Judge Garbis wrote,

“The Court holds that the Ordinance violates the Freedom of Speech Clause of Article I of the Constitution of the United States and is unenforceable. Whether a provider of pregnancy-related services is ‘pro-life’ or ‘pro-choice,’ it is for the provider –– not the government –– to decide when and how to discuss abortion and birth-control methods.”

Journalist

Chelsea Garcia is a political writer with a special interest in international relations and social issues. Events surrounding the war in Ukraine and the war in Israel are a major focus for political journalists. But as a former local reporter, she is also interested in national politics.

Chelsea Garcia studied media, communication and political science in Texas, USA, and learned the journalistic trade during an internship at a daily newspaper. In addition to her political writing, she is pursuing a master's degree in multimedia and writing at Texas.

Order Now!

spot_img

Latest articles

The EU’s plans for the abolition of the secrecy of digital letters

Surveillance of private chats without suspicion could soon become mandatory in the EU. This...

Lloyd’s: Government behind Nord Stream sabotage

About a month ago, Zug-based Nord Stream AG filed a lawsuit against its insurers....

More like this

Biden urges hostage deal

US President Biden has called on Qatar and Egypt to do everything possible to...

Trump trial: ex-president rushes from court to campaign trail

Update, 11:00 a.m.: In the U.S., experts are surprised that Judge Juan Merchan has...

Donald Trump Ignores Court Gag Order

Trump can't talk about those involved in the New York trial. The ex-president can,...