HomeoldNew law in North Carolina leads to sharp drop in the number...

New law in North Carolina leads to sharp drop in the number of abortions

Published on

In a promising development from North Carolina, the results of the recent election have demonstrated the significant impact of electoral processes on social issues. The increase in the number of pro-life supporters has been correlated with a decline in the incidence of abortion.

Rachel Crumpler, reporting on Friday, wrote

The number of abortions provided in North Carolina has dropped significantly after the implementation of increased restrictions in the state on July 1, according to data estimates from a national organization that tracks trends in reproductive health.

During the first month operating under North Carolina’s new law that limits most abortions after 12 weeks of pregnancy and requires two in-person appointments for anyone seeking an abortion, the Guttmacher Institute reported that medication and procedural [surgical] abortions provided in the state in July dropped by 31 percent from the previous month. A new round of data released this week demonstrates how the state’s restrictions hinder access to abortion care. 

While the Guttmacher Institute found that the number of abortions provided in August increased slightly from July, the total was still down 28 percent from June, before the restrictions took effect.

The more than 4,200 abortions documented in June dropped by roughly 1,200 in August. Crumpler interviewed data scientist Isaac Maddow-Zimet, who leads Guttmacher’s Monthly Abortion Provision Study project.

“Unfortunately, what we see in August is really not much of a recovery,” Maddow-Zimet said. “That suggests to us that this ban and the addition of the in-person counseling requirement is too much of an obstacle for many folks in North Carolina and those traveling to North Carolina to be able to overcome to receive care.”

Effect on nearby states? “Maddow-Zimet said Guttmacher data showed no increases in abortions provided in nearby states like Virginia, the District of Columbia or Maryland that would offset the decline in North Carolina.”

“Unfortunately, what we see in August is really not much of a recovery,” Maddow-Zimet said. “That suggests to us that this ban and the addition of the in-person counseling requirement is too much of an obstacle for many folks in North Carolina and those traveling to North Carolina to be able to overcome to receive care.”

The gestational limit alone—from 20 weeks down to 12 weeks—“does not account for the significant monthly volume declines in July and August of 1,300 and 1,200 fewer abortions than before the law took effect,” Rivera reported.

There was also the impact of requiring women to receive in-person counseling “at least 72 hours before an abortion — something that could previously occur by telephone — is making it harder for people to access the procedure,” according to North Carolina Health News.

The implementation of a new law in North Carolina has resulted in a significant decrease in the number of abortions performed in the state, highlighting the impact of legislative measures on reproductive healthcare access and outcomes. The decline in abortion rates underscores the complex interplay between legal regulations, healthcare policies, and individual decision-making regarding pregnancy and reproductive choices.

The introduction of the new law likely represents a shift in the legal and regulatory landscape surrounding abortion in North Carolina, potentially imposing restrictions or requirements that affect access to abortion services. Such measures may include mandatory waiting periods, informed consent requirements, restrictions on abortion providers, or limitations on public funding for abortion services.

These legal changes can have profound implications for individuals seeking abortion care, influencing their ability to access timely and affordable services, as well as their decision-making processes regarding pregnancy options. The decrease in the number of abortions following the implementation of the new law suggests that some individuals may face increased barriers or challenges in obtaining abortion services under the revised legal framework.

However, it’s important to note that changes in abortion rates may also reflect broader social, economic, and healthcare trends that extend beyond legislative measures alone. Factors such as increased access to contraception, improvements in reproductive healthcare services, shifts in cultural attitudes towards abortion, and changes in demographic patterns can all influence abortion rates over time.

Furthermore, the decrease in abortion rates may be interpreted differently depending on one’s perspective on reproductive rights and healthcare policy. Supporters of abortion rights may view the decline as concerning, highlighting the potential impact of restrictive legislation on individuals’ ability to access comprehensive reproductive healthcare. Conversely, opponents of abortion may see the decrease as a positive outcome, reflecting efforts to promote alternatives to abortion and support for pregnant individuals and families.

As discussions around abortion rights and access continue, it’s essential to consider the diverse perspectives and experiences of individuals affected by these policies. While legislative measures can shape the legal landscape surrounding abortion, addressing the complex social, economic, and healthcare factors that influence reproductive decision-making requires a comprehensive and multifaceted approach. Ultimately, efforts to promote reproductive justice and support individuals’ autonomy and well-being should prioritize equity, compassion, and respect for individual rights and choices.


Chelsea Garcia is a political writer with a special interest in international relations and social issues. Events surrounding the war in Ukraine and the war in Israel are a major focus for political journalists. But as a former local reporter, she is also interested in national politics.

Chelsea Garcia studied media, communication and political science in Texas, USA, and learned the journalistic trade during an internship at a daily newspaper. In addition to her political writing, she is pursuing a master's degree in multimedia and writing at Texas.

Order Now!


Latest articles

The EU’s plans for the abolition of the secrecy of digital letters

Surveillance of private chats without suspicion could soon become mandatory in the EU. This...

Lloyd’s: Government behind Nord Stream sabotage

About a month ago, Zug-based Nord Stream AG filed a lawsuit against its insurers....

More like this

Biden urges hostage deal

US President Biden has called on Qatar and Egypt to do everything possible to...

Trump trial: ex-president rushes from court to campaign trail

Update, 11:00 a.m.: In the U.S., experts are surprised that Judge Juan Merchan has...

Donald Trump Ignores Court Gag Order

Trump can't talk about those involved in the New York trial. The ex-president can,...