HomeoldFlorida Supreme Court votes 5-2 to take up challenge to 24-hour waiting...

Florida Supreme Court votes 5-2 to take up challenge to 24-hour waiting period law

Published on

Coming as no surprise, on Thursday the Florida Supreme Court voted 5-2 to review the challenge brought by the ACLU against Florida’s law requiring a woman to meet in person with an abortionist at least 24 hours prior to having an abortion.

It was by that same 5-2 margin that the state’s highest court last month voted to put HB633 on hold until it decided whether –as it did yesterday–to take up the reflection period.

The court’s action is the latest in a long series of challenges that began the day after pro-life Gov. Rick Scott signed HB633 into law in June 2015. Put another way, the legal maneuvering since Gov. Scott signed the legislation boggles the mind.

As NRL News Today reported, at the end of June 2015, Chief Circuit Judge Charles Francis blocked the 24-hour waiting period from going into effect.

HB 633, which was strongly supported by the Florida legislature, had been scheduled to take effect the following day.

A slew of back-and-forth rulings ensued. Finally, on February 26, 2016, a three-judge panel for Florida’s First District Court of Appeal ruled that the temporary injunction did not meet a legal test required for a temporary injunction.

The judges– Bradford Thomas, Susan Kelsey and William Stone –wrote, “In the abortion context as in any other, injunctive relief requires competent, substantial evidence to support the necessary findings of fact.” The original order (by 2nd Circuit Court Judge Charles Dodson) was “legally insufficient to justify this injunctive relief.”

Then followed the state Supreme Court’s April 22 decision to block enforcement while it pondered  whether to accept the case brought by the ACLU on behalf of Gainesville Woman Care and yesterday’s vote to take up the case.

Journalist

Chelsea Garcia is a political writer with a special interest in international relations and social issues. Events surrounding the war in Ukraine and the war in Israel are a major focus for political journalists. But as a former local reporter, she is also interested in national politics.

Chelsea Garcia studied media, communication and political science in Texas, USA, and learned the journalistic trade during an internship at a daily newspaper. In addition to her political writing, she is pursuing a master's degree in multimedia and writing at Texas.

Order Now!

spot_img

Latest articles

The EU’s plans for the abolition of the secrecy of digital letters

Surveillance of private chats without suspicion could soon become mandatory in the EU. This...

Lloyd’s: Government behind Nord Stream sabotage

About a month ago, Zug-based Nord Stream AG filed a lawsuit against its insurers....

More like this

Biden urges hostage deal

US President Biden has called on Qatar and Egypt to do everything possible to...

Trump trial: ex-president rushes from court to campaign trail

Update, 11:00 a.m.: In the U.S., experts are surprised that Judge Juan Merchan has...

Donald Trump Ignores Court Gag Order

Trump can't talk about those involved in the New York trial. The ex-president can,...