Editor’s note. This appears in the current digital edition of National Right to Life News. Please share this story and the entire contents of the 48-page issue with your pro-life family and friends. By Maria V. Gallagher, Legislative Director, Pennsylvania Pro-Life Federation We all look at life from different perspectives. This is also true when …Continue reading "Roe v. Wade: Through a Daughter’s Eyes"
By Dave Andrusko Editor’s note. We are exactly two weeks out from the 46th anniversary of two infamous January 22, 1973 decisions–Roe v. Wade, with dealt with a Texas law, and Doe v. Bolton, which dealt with a Georgia law. We are re-running posts from past editions of NRL News Today and NRL News along …Continue reading "Roe v. Wade: Lost lives, broken hearts"
By Dave Andrusko I don’t know how I missed it. But thanks to the good work of Bill Donohue, president of the Catholic League, I am now aware of what Donohue described as a “positively astonishing” eight-part series in the New York Times which is “clearly the most rabid defense of abortion ever published by …Continue reading "On the eve of the 46th anniversary of Roe, the New York Times goes nuclear"
By Dave Andrusko Editor’s note. As we approach the 46th anniversary of Roe v. Wade, we are running articles from the past which relate directly [or even indirectly] to the somber realization that over 60 million unborn babies have paid the ultimate price for Justice Blackmun’s jurisprudential flights of imagination. The following ran in 2005, …Continue reading "A fanciful portrayal of Justice Harry Blackmun, author of Roe v. Wade"
By Dave Andrusko Editor’s note. As we approach the 46th anniversary of the awful Roe v. Wade decision, we are posting new stories and reposting old stories previously run in NRL News Today in anticipation. This first ran in January 22, 2018. As we reflect back today on Roe v. Wade’s and Doe v. Bolton‘s …Continue reading "The fateful 19 months that culminated in Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton"
By Susan E. Wills, Esq. Editor’s note. As we approach the 46th anniversary of the awful Roe v. Wade decision, we are posting new stories and reposting old stories previously run in NRL News Today in anticipation. This is an older post from 2003 but is very much worth reading. Decisions of the U.S. Supreme …Continue reading "Ten Legal Reasons to Reject Roe"
By Dave Andrusko Editor’s note. We are less than a month away from the 46th anniversary of the abominable Roe v. Wade decision and its equally hideous companion, Doe v. Bolton. As is our custom, the day after Christmas we began posting new stories and previously run stores about Roe and Doe in anticipation. The …Continue reading "An inconvenient truth that runs counter to the pro-abortion narrative: “Jane Roe” never aborted"
By Charles J. Chaput, O.F.M. Cap., Archbishop of Philadelphia Editor’s note. We are less than a month away from the 46th anniversary of the abominable Roe v. Wade decision and its equally hideous companion, Doe v. Bolton. Beginning today we will post new stories and repost previously run stores about Roe and Doe in anticipation. …Continue reading "Roe v. Wade– a uniquely intimate form of violence but violence with bitter public consequences"
By Maria V. Gallagher, Legislative Director, Pennsylvania Pro-Life Federation As we come upon the 46th anniversary of Roe v. Wade, the U.S. Supreme Court ruling which legalized abortion, here are 46 reasons for hope for the decision’s ultimate demise: Statistics show the number of abortions in the U.S. are on the decline. Polls show the …Continue reading "46 Reasons for Hope as we approach the anniversary of Roe v. Wade"
By Paul Stark, Communications Associate, Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life The Supreme Court could indeed reverse Roe outright at some point in the future—or scale it back gradually over time as the justices consider and uphold new abortion limits. No one knows for sure what will happen. But a lot of misunderstandings surround the possible …Continue reading "Overturning Roe v. Wade: Four huge myths"
By Paul Stark A new Star Tribune-MPR News poll indicates that 59 percent of Minnesotans want Roe v. Wade kept in place. That’s a highly misleading and unreliable finding. Here’s the poll question: “Roe v. Wade was the Supreme Court decision that made abortion legal. Would you like to see that abortion law kept in …Continue reading "Poll of Minnesotans’ views on Roe v. Wade is highly misleading"
By Melissa Ohden Editor’s note. The following is excerpted from a post on Melissa’s blog. In 1977 Melissa survived a saline infusion abortion. She has written many times for NRL News Today and NRL News and appeared numerous times at NRLC’s annual convention. As Richard Wolf reported in his 2015 piece for USA Today, “The …Continue reading "Courting Life: The Kavanaugh Confirmation Hearings"