‘Ours is a movement . . . about love and mercy’

By Archbishop Joseph F. Naumann Editor’s note. My family and I will be on our vacation through August 27. I will occasionally add new items but for the most part we will repost “the best of the best” — the stories our readers have told us they especially liked. Editor’s note: I was privileged to …

Continue reading "‘Ours is a movement . . . about love and mercy’"

Sally Blackmun, Justice Blackmun’s daughter, speaks about her father’s Roe v. Wade decision

By Sarah Terzo (The following is taken from Anne Hendershott’s, The Politics of Abortion, where Hendershott analyzes what Justice Blackmun’s daughter, Sally Blackmun, wrote in her introduction to Gloria Feldt’s book, The War on Choice.) Sally Blackmun, Supreme Court Justice Harry Blackmun’s daughter, talks about why he found in favor of Roe v. Wade: “Sally …

Continue reading "Sally Blackmun, Justice Blackmun’s daughter, speaks about her father’s Roe v. Wade decision"

What to do about “The Woes of Roe”? Rebrand!

By Dave Andrusko The Abortion Industry and its minions in the media never run out of stories with complementary narratives. On the one hand, we’re told that Roe v. Wade is toast, but on the other hand, there is a way to save “reproductive rights.” What changes is the immediate impetus for the Chicken Little …

Continue reading "What to do about “The Woes of Roe”? Rebrand!"

Greenhouse celebrates the late Justice Stevens “who helped protect a woman’s right to choose”

By Dave Andrusko Over the decades since Justice Harry Blackmun unleashed the Roe v. Wade pestilence, periodically you will read stories, occasionally the bulk of entire books, which maintain that Blackmun was essentially a dolt whom other justices had to help reach his abortion-on-demand conclusion. One of the earlier “inside the court” books was, “The …

Continue reading "Greenhouse celebrates the late Justice Stevens “who helped protect a woman’s right to choose”"

Roe v. Wade subverted the Fourteenth Amendment to impose abortion on demand

By Paul Stark, Communications Associate, Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life In 1868, in the wake of the Civil War, the Fourteenth Amendment was added to the U.S. Constitution. It affirms (in part): “No State shall … deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within …

Continue reading "Roe v. Wade subverted the Fourteenth Amendment to impose abortion on demand"

60% say Supreme Court should hear abortion cases

By Dave Andrusko With all the attention paid to abortion, it stands to reason there will be a growing number of public opinion polls taken. Yesterday, National Right to Life News Today analyzed a Harvard CAPS/Harris poll which found 70% of the respondents against permitted a mother and the abortionist “to end the life” of …

Continue reading "60% say Supreme Court should hear abortion cases"

The latest CBS News poll on Roe reversal as flawed as ever

By Dave Andrusko Let’s say for the sake of argument, when pollsters ask about Roe v. Wade they are serious about finding out what the public is thinking about reversal (which is the question they most often ask). Not that they are, but let’s pretend they are. So CBS News asked two questions about Roe …

Continue reading "The latest CBS News poll on Roe reversal as flawed as ever"

Roe v. Wade’s Disastrous Impact on Medical Ethics

By Nancy Valko Most people volunteer for the pro-life movement. I consider myself a draftee. For me, there was no “choice.” I became a conscript because of personal and professional experiences that followed in the wake of the Roe v Wade decision. I was a young intensive care unit nurse when the Roe v. Wade …

Continue reading "Roe v. Wade’s Disastrous Impact on Medical Ethics"

Dred Scott and Roe v. Wade: Judicial abominations that “denied the value of certain human lives”

By Dave Andrusko One hundred and sixty two years ago today, the Supreme Court handed down its disastrous Dred Scott v. Sanford decision. Like Roe v. Wade, to which pro-lifers routinely compare it, the High Court’s vote was 7-2. Like Roe v. Wade, Dred Scott v. Sanford “solved” nothing because it was incompatible with justice. …

Continue reading "Dred Scott and Roe v. Wade: Judicial abominations that “denied the value of certain human lives”"

“Askew, Misaligned, and Twisted to One Side”: Roe’s Devastating Impact on American Culture

By Jean Garton Editor’s note. The late Dr. Garton authored one of the enduring classics of pro-life literature: “Who Broke the Baby? What the Abortion Slogans Really Mean. ” For decades she was a frequent contributor to National Right to Life News and National Right to Life News Today. We periodically repost one of her …

Continue reading "“Askew, Misaligned, and Twisted to One Side”: Roe’s Devastating Impact on American Culture"

A 21st Century Guide to Roe v. Wade

By Maria V. Gallagher, Legislative Director, Pennsylvania Pro-Life Federation Editor’s note. This appeared in the monthly digital edition of National Right to Life News. We have a new college intern at the National Right to Life affiliate where I work, the Pennsylvania Pro-Life Federation. Because of her youth, most of her memories are of this …

Continue reading "A 21st Century Guide to Roe v. Wade"

The ripple effects of “rolling back” Roe v. Wade

By Dave Andrusko The Abortion Industrial Complex has known for years and years that no matter how many misrepresented polls they trot out, support for abortion is discrete, finite, and subject to erosion. As we have documented countless dozens of times, a majority of the American people consistently opposes the reasons 90+% of all abortions …

Continue reading "The ripple effects of “rolling back” Roe v. Wade"