By Dave Andrusko Why do pro-abortionists come absolutely unhinged when the case is made that chemical abortions can be halted, provided the woman does not take the second of the two drugs that make up the chemical abortion regime (“RU-486” for short)? Why must abortion reversal be (in their opinion) not just ineffective but dangerous? …
Continue reading "Pro-abortionists come unhinged at thought of abortion reversal"By Dave Andrusko This is the last post of the day and, as such, will be less analysis and more summary. To get the full picture, let me strongly encourage you to read, “The Abortion Reversal ‘Witch Hunt’: Dismissing this ‘junk science’ has ethical and moral implications” by Philip Reed. By way of introduction to …
Continue reading "Critics of abortion reversal have “perfected obfuscation and paternalism”"By Ingrid Duran, Director, NRLC Department of State Legislation Editor’s note. The appeared on in the September digital edition of National Right to Life News. Please share the contents of this 37-page-issue with pro-life family and friends using your social media outlets. A chemical abortion, commonly known as RU-486, occurs when a mother is given …
Continue reading "Reversing Chemical Abortions a threat to Abortion on Demand Ideology"By Dave Andrusko Late yesterday we reported on a vote in the Indiana House in favor of HB 1128, a bill that offers women information about how a chemical abortion they have begun may be reversed. The vote was close, 7-6, but HB 1128 now moves onto the Indiana Senate where the case will be …
Continue reading "Why abortion reversal can and does work"Baby now five months old By Dave Andrusko Mega-kudos to Fox 46 WJZY in Charlotte, North Carolina for its terrific story about Dr. Matthew Harrison and a 5-month-old baby boy named Walker who was saved by a new technique that may, if started promptly enough, be able to reverse the effect of RU-486. To understand …
Continue reading "Fox 46 interviews mother whose chemical abortion was reversed"