By We Need a Law A panel of three judges unanimously found that the city of Guelph’s decision to remove pro-life bus ads unjustifiably disregarded the Charter’s guarantee of freedom of expression. I’m sure many of us are concerned about censorship in Canada, but this decision confirms that we still have so much freedom to express ourselves. …Continue reading "A win for pro-life freedom of expression in Guelph"
Dear Senator: On Monday, October 19, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer filed cloture on S. 2747, the so-called “Freedom to Vote Act.” The National Right to Life Committee (NRLC), representing state right-to-life organizations nationwide, urges you to oppose S. 2747. This legislation has been carefully crafted to maximize short-term political benefits for the dominant faction …Continue reading "NRLC writes Senate to oppose S. 2747, the so-called “Freedom to Vote Act”"
By Nancy Flanders | September 15, 2021 , 04:26pm This week, the stranglehold of Big Tech on the pro-life message was demonstrated in more than one way. Google removed Live Action’s ads promoting abortion pill reversal in a clear act of discrimination, and New York Governor Kathy Hochul called for Facebook to censor “misinformation” about abortion, …Continue reading "New York’s new governor wants Facebook to ‘curb the spread’ of the pro-life message"
A relief to pro-life students in particular, who have experienced discrimination from university authorities By Right to Life UK The Queen’s Speech has set out the Government’s intentions to introduce laws designed to protect freedom of speech at universities. In her speech this Tuesday as part of the State Opening of Parliament, the Queen outlined the …Continue reading "Queen Elizabeth’s Speech to Parliament sets out Govt’s plans to protect free speech at universities"
By Laura Echevarria, Director of Communications and Press Secretary WASHINGTON — Voting 220-210, with no Republican support, the House of Representatives Wednesday approved H.R. 1, the so-called “For the People Act of 2021.” The purpose of H.R. 1 is to discourage, as much as possible, disfavored groups (such as the National Right to Life Committee) from communicating …Continue reading "House approves H.R. 1, would violate First Amendment and suppress free speech"
By Dave Andrusko We’ve run posts previously which give us fair warning where a pro-abortion President Joe Biden would take us. We have two more today which in many respects complement one another. The first is built upon what Alexander Hall describes as “Biden Campaign Website Promises Internet Censorship Taskforce.” The second is taken from …Continue reading "Guess what speech won’t be free in a Joe Biden administration?"
By We Need a Law Over the past few years, “safe access zone” laws, also called bubble zone laws, have been passed in Ontario, Alberta, Nova Scotia, and Quebec, and currently there is private member’s bill regarding this at the Manitoban legislature. Every time a province considers this issue, we’ve let you know and asked …Continue reading "Canadian update: Three concerns with how bubble zone laws specifically ban pro-life speech"
By Anna Reynolds On Monday, three judges on the Alberta Court of Appeals unanimously ruled in favor of UAlberta Pro-Life, the pro-life student group at the University of Alberta in Canada. The CBC reports that the appeal stems from a 2016 case brought by the pro-life group after the university approved an event on the …Continue reading "Canadian student group wins appeal against university for suppressing pro-life expression"
By Calvin Freiburger October 28, 2019 – Pro-life teen Nick Sandmann’s defamation suit against the Washington Post got a new lease on life Monday thanks to US District Judge William Bertelsman partially reversing his prior ruling, which will allow the suit to move forward. Immediately following the January March for Life in Washington, D.C., the …Continue reading "Judge allows pro-life teen Nick Sandmann to sue Washington Post, reverses prior ruling"
By Dave Andrusko Earlier today, NRLC issued a blistering critique of the Democrat-controlled House’s 234-193 vote in support of H.R. 1. We are only two months into the new Congress, and H.R. 1 may have already won the “Euphemism-of-the-Year” award for the bill’s title: “For the People Act of 2019.” Of course, the bill has …Continue reading "House Democrats’ astonishing contempt for free speech"
By Ryan Scott Bomberger For Christ and His Kingdom. That’s the motto featured prominently throughout Wheaton College. But what happens when it’s not about Christ or His Kingdom? I found that out recently after being invited by Wheaton College Republicans to speak on something I’m deeply familiar with—abortion and race. As someone conceived in rape …Continue reading "Wheaton College Smears Black Prolife Speaker for Talk on Race and Abortion"
By Maria V. Gallagher, Legislative Director, Pennsylvania Pro-Life Federation We as Americans take our rights very seriously. The right to free speech. The right to freedom of religion. The right to peaceable assembly. But there is so much wrong with the so-called “right” to an abortion. To begin with, each abortion ends an innocent, unrepeatable …Continue reading "There is So Much Wrong with This “Right”"