Category: Dobbs

Editor’s note. On Tuesday the Senate witnessed an extraordinary outpouring of pro-life speeches. We posted three of those remarks yesterday and are posting two more today. The following comes from Sen. Roger Marshall (R-Ks.). Mr. President, last Friday, during the annual March for Life, it was once again encouraging to see tens of thousands of …

Editor’s note. On Tuesday the Senate witnessed an extraordinary outpouring of pro-life speeches. We posted three of those remarks yesterday and are posting two more today. The following comes from Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC). Mr. President, I rise to join my colleagues in a discussion about the right to life and what happened last week …

By Randall K. O’Bannon, Ph.D., NRL Director of Education & Research Editor’s note. In Part One, Dr. O’Bannon related the most recent abortion numbers and began his explanation of how and why compiling accurate abortion information is going to be a complex task in the post-Dobbs era. Today, in conclusion, he will look at one …

By Randall K. O’Bannon, Ph.D., NRL Director of Education & Research To any observer, the overturning of Roe was obviously an enormously significant event in our nation’s history and a political watershed. Abortion was no longer, by the Supreme Court’s fiat, legal in all fifty states, throughout pregnancy, for any and every reason or none at all. …

But the Dobbs decision opens the door to a fresh dialogue over abortion—one that must address fundamental questions about the reality of science, the scope of human rights, and the demands of love. This is a conversation that those of us in the pro-life movement are eager to have. Read the whole story.

By Dave Andrusko In what evidently was his public response since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, Justice  Samuel Alito, author of the Dobbs decision, said he was “honored” to have written the historic 6-3 decision. “In a keynote address in Rome that was put on by the University of Notre Dame Law School, …

Considering these facts, it’s difficult to understand the extreme reaction many in the pro-abortion camp have had to this ruling. The justices didn’t change a single law. What they did was return the issue to the states, and thus, the voters. Read the whole story.

By Carol Tobias, President Editor’s note. This appeared in the July issue of National Right to Life News, “the pro-life newspaper of record.” Please be sure to pass this historic, first-issue after Roe fell to your pro-life family and friends. Roe v Wade and Planned Parenthood v Casey are gone! We’ve worked for the overturn …

By Dave Andrusko When a friend forwarded this to me, I’ll be honest. I was so busy putting together the July issue of National Right to Life News that I just put it aside. That was a mistake. I believe after reading Prof. Akhil Reed Amar, you’ll be more readily able to handle critiques of …

We’ve used these words for almost 50 years to clearly state our case — the right to kill unborn children was never a principle supported by, or even imagined by, our founding fathers. Thanks be to God, the U.S. Supreme Court made it very clear that abortion is not a constitutional right, and that it …