Second judge temporarily blocks Indiana’s new pro-life abortion law

By Dave Andrusko

On different grounds, a second judge, Marion County Superior Court Judge Heather Welch, has blocked Indiana’s pro-life Senate Enrolled Act 1. 

The ACLU argues that the law violates Indiana’s Religious Freedom Restoration Act. Judge Welch “found the plaintiffs could suffer irreparable harm if an injunction is not put in place,” according to reporter Jared Gans. In issuing a preliminary injunction, “She said the ban substantially burdens their religious exercise and is not the least restrictive measure to achieve a governmental interest.”

The Indiana Supreme Court is set to hear oral arguments on the first judge’s ruling next month to determine whether the law violates the state constitution. Owen County Judge Kelsey Hanlon had blocked the law from being enforced. He wrote, “There is reasonable likelihood that this significant restriction of personal autonomy offends the liberty guarantees of the Indiana Constitution” and that the clinics will prevail in the lawsuit.

The state Supreme Court had “denied a request from the state attorney general’s office to set aside the preliminary injunction, setting a hearing on the lawsuit filed by abortion clinic operators for Jan. 12,” Tom Davies of the Associated Press reported.

Indiana’s SB 1 was the first new protective pro-life law passed by a state legislature following the June 24th overturning of Roe v. Wade.  SB 1 was passed by the legislature on August 5 and signed by Gov. Eric Holcomb. 

Following Judge Hanlon ruling, Indiana Right to Life CEO Mike Fichter said “We are deeply disappointed the Indiana Supreme Court will allow the injunction against Indiana’s new abortion law to remain in effect pending appeal. We estimate at least three thousand unborn babies, whose lives otherwise might have been saved, will now needlessly die from abortion as the law remains blocked. Thousands more will die as we await a final ruling after the January hearing. Although we are confident the law will be upheld, it will be far too late for those whose lives will be lost as this is argued in the courts.”

Recent Posts

The glory of our humanity begins with a single cell: That’s you and me at our first moment of existence.

By Randall K. O’Bannon, Ph.D. NRL Director of Education & Research When the cell was… Read More

5 mins ago

What is the effect of an abortion on the grandparents? On the siblings?

By Dave Andrusko I remember the first time (it was a long time ago) that… Read More

7 mins ago

Attorney General Wilson Tells Pharmacies Abortion Pill by Mail Unsafe, Illegal; Use of Mail to Take Human Life “Reprehensible”

By Holly Gatling, Executive Director, South Carolina Citizens for Life Editor’s note. Rite Aid has… Read More

16 mins ago

Are Canadians having buyer’s remorse about euthanasia?

By Michael Cook Finally, after 40,000 or so deaths, Canadians are having second thoughts about… Read More

19 mins ago

Abortionist compares abortion to war, other forms of killing

By Sarah Terzo Pro-choice activist Judith Arcana, who has done abortions, says: “I think abortion belongs… Read More

32 mins ago

Attorneys general warn CVS and Walgreens to avoid mail-order abortion pill distribution

By Bridget Sielicki  Editor’s note. Rite Aid has also said they will send out abortion pills… Read More

48 mins ago