Assisted Suicide

“Rigged” consultation – 3,526 submissions opposing assisted suicide removed from Scottish assisted suicide consultation

By Right to Life UK

3,526 submissions from members of the public to the consultation on Liam McArthur’s assisted suicide Bill has been removed, resulting in calls for the Scottish Government to conduct an urgent independent review of the handling of the consultation process.

Liam McArthur conducted a consultation on his assisted suicide Bill that closed on December 22, 2021, with the results of the consultation released Thursday. The consultation report outlined that Liam McArthur has chosen to remove all consultation submissions from members of the public who were mobilised to make a submission through a campaign run by Right To Life UK, which encouraged members of the public to submit to the consultation.

Right To Life UK’s internal systems show that 3,526 submissions to the consultation were made from members of the public off the back of the campaign, all opposing assisted suicide, and the consultation report states that all submissions made off the back of that campaign were removed. 

These submissions were made by members of the public who provided all the contact details that the consultation required to be included with each individual submission.

The largest assisted suicide lobby group in the country, Dignity in Dying, also mobilised supporters to submit to the consultation, but there is no mention in the report of removing submissions from members of the public who were mobilised to submit by that campaign.

The consultation report claims that all the submissions mobilised by the Right To Life UK campaign were removed because some of them used either identical or similar language when describing their opposition to assisted suicide. There was no mention when the consultation launched that if submissions used similar language, they would be removed, along with all other submissions that were mobilised by a given campaign.

Right To Life UK spokesperson, Catherine Robinson, said: “Members of the public made submissions to the consultation off the back of a campaign we ran to mobilise people to submit to the consultation. 

“Liam McArthur appears to have rigged the outcome of the consultation by removing all 3,526 submissions made off the back of this campaign. Funnily enough, all these submissions opposed his Bill, but when it came to submissions mobilised by pro-assisted suicide organisations that supported this bill, they were not removed.

“This is the type of tactic one would expect to see used in a crackpot dictatorship where elections are rigged; instead we see a Scottish politician using it to rig a consultation so that he can claim there is more support for the Bill than there really is. 

“We are calling on the Scottish Government to urgently undertake an independent review of the handling of this consultation and ensure that all members of the public who made their voices heard through making a submission are included in the results of this consultation, regardless of their stance on assisted suicide.”

Recent Posts

“You can’t … you’re not capable … you can only succeed if ….”

Our society is indeed broken. Women are capable, beautiful, incredible creations.  But what is ringing… Read More

2 days ago

The 2022 elections are not over! 

By Karen Cross, Political Director We have one more opportunity to stand up for life… Read More

2 days ago

State Figures Provide Important Context for National Abortion Trends

NRLC Analysis of New Abortion Reports, Part Four By Randall K. O’Bannon, Ph.D., NRL Director… Read More

2 days ago

Premature baby who weighed the same as a loaf of bread heads home

By Bridget Sielicki  A premature baby who was so small at birth that she weighed… Read More

2 days ago

Texas Abortions Drop From 2,500 to 68 in First Month After Roe Overturned

By Kim Schwartz, Texas Right to Life Abortions in Texas plummeted after the reversal of Roe… Read More

2 days ago

Why do Democrats refuse to treat abortion survivors? A dead baby was always the point. How you got there was just details.

By Dave Andrusko “Thousands of medical ethicists and bioethicists, as they are called, professionally guide… Read More

2 days ago