Judicial

Post-Roe, more focus on state supreme courts

By Dave Andrusko

Pro-lifers have long recognized the importance of the Supreme Court. After all the justices gave us Roe v. Wade—essentially legalizing abortion on demand—but also Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization—which overturned Roe. Our attention has also always been on the state’s supreme courts.

Some have been disasters for the cause of unborn children. Most recently the Kansas Supreme Court, on a 6-1 vote, shot down the Kansas Unborn Child Protection from Dismemberment Abortion Act and in the process found in various penumbras and emanations in the state Constitution’s Bill of Rights a “right” to abortion.

Although you’d never know it from the majority opinion, the law, S.B. 95, prohibits abortions in which a fully-formed unborn child is torn apart with sharp metal tools, bit by bit, while still alive, inside her mother.

The Associated Press’s Andrew Demillo wrote a thoughtful story that ran in the Washington Post today headlined “Abortion ruling intensified fight over state supreme courts” [].

Demillo  cites Illinois as a state “surrounded by states with abortion bans that took effect after Roe v. Wade fell,” that “is one of the few places where the procedure remains legal in the Midwest.”

Abortion-rights supporters are worried that might not last. Their concern is shared in at least a half-dozen states, and this year it’s not just about state legislatures. In Illinois, Democrats hold a supermajority, and the governor, a Democrat, is expected to win reelection.

Instead, Republicans could be on the verge of winning control of the Illinois Supreme Court, where Democrats currently hold a 4-3 majority. Two seats are up for election in November, prompting groups that have normally set their sights on other offices to concentrate attention and money on the judicial campaigns.

Sarah Standiford, national campaigns director for Planned Parenthood Action Fund, told Demillo, “It’s increasingly clear that the way access is playing out is at the state level, which puts the role of the court in stark relief.” 

Demillo also sites Michigan, Ohio, North Carolina, Kentucky, and Kansas as states with competitive contests for seats on the state’s highest court that bear watching.

Recent Posts

Happy Thanksgiving!

Oh give thanks to the LORD, for He is good; for His steadfast love endures… Read More

4 days ago

2020 Abortion Numbers from U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Show a Decline

WASHINGTON — On Wednesday, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) released its… Read More

5 days ago

President Reagan’s 1986 Thanksgiving Proclamation ‘affirming our gratitude for the many blessings bestowed upon this land and its people’

By Dave Andrusko Editor’s note. Tomorrow is Thanksgiving. Over the years we have posted many… Read More

5 days ago

Simple Reminders about the Value of Adoption

By Micaiah Bilger Editor’s note. November is Adoption Awareness Month. Micaiah Bilger was Education Director… Read More

5 days ago

North Dakota AG says District Judge erred in issuing a preliminary injunction against its trigger law

By Dave Andrusko The North Dakota Supreme Court has scheduled oral arguments next week to… Read More

5 days ago

Here’s abortionist Willie Parker’s incoherent argument against human equality

By Paul Stark Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life “Abortion kills a human being,” said Willie… Read More

5 days ago