Dobbs

Rasmussen finds 50% of Likely Voters approve of Supreme Court decision returning the abortion issue to the states

By Dave Andrusko

The headline to a post at Rasmussen Reports reads “Abortion: Half of Voters Approve Supreme Court Ruling.” According to the survey, “50% of Likely U.S. voters approve of the Supreme Court abortion ruling, including 38% who Strongly Approve of the decision.” 45% disapprove, including 38% who disapprove strongly.

That most assuredly is not what you read elsewhere. Is there something different about this survey that you won’t find in other gauges of public sentiment?

Rasmussen’s abortion question is “The Supreme Court recently overturned the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision, so that each state can now determine its own laws regarding abortion. Do you approve or disapprove of the court overturning Roe v. Wade?”

This is simple but 100% accurate. The High Court ruled on the continuity viability of Roe and the conclusion was not only had it proven to be a mistake over time but Roe was corrupt from the moment of conception. The justices returned the abortion issue to the states—exactly the way Rasmussen phrased it.

Other details include some predictable results, but also some surprises.

It’s predictable that 75% of Republicans approve of the Supreme Court’s Dobbs decision. (88% of self-identified pro-lifers approved.) And while 71% of Democrats disapproved, 25% approved. (78% of self-identified pro-choice voters disapproved.) 

“According to Rasmussen, 53% of whites, 41% of black voters and 49% of other minorities at least somewhat approve of the Supreme Court decision overturning Roe v. Wade.”

The Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision was written by Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito. 

Decisions have a syllabus which summarizes the opinion. In a key paragraph, the syllabus reads

Like the infamous decision in Plessy v. Ferguson, Roe was also egregiously wrong and on a collision course with the Constitution from the day it was decided. Casey perpetuated its errors, calling both sides of the national controversy to resolve their debate, but in doing so, Casey necessarily declared a winning side. Those on the losing side—those who sought to advance the State’s interest in fetal life—could no longer seek to persuade their elected representatives to adopt policies consistent with their views. The Court short-circuited the democratic process by closing it to the large number of Americans who disagreed with Roe

Recent Posts

GEORGIA!!! It’s time to vote.

When pro-lifers stay home, pro-aborts win. Help protect unborn babies, their movers, and more balanced… Read More

4 hours ago

The 2022 elections are not over! 

By Karen Cross, Political Director We have one more opportunity to stand up for life… Read More

4 hours ago

Second judge temporarily blocks Indiana’s new pro-life abortion law

By Dave Andrusko On different grounds, a second judge, Marion County Superior Court Judge Heather… Read More

4 hours ago

Having stirred controversy, Canadian fashion giant Simons pulls ad without explanation

By Dave Andrusko After Canadian fashion giant La Maison Simons generated a wave of controversy… Read More

4 hours ago

Perfect contrast in Georgia’s runoff: Pro-Life Herschel Walker versus pro-abortion Sen. Raphael Warnock

By Dave Andrusko It shouldn’t, and it doesn’t surprise us, that in the final stages… Read More

4 hours ago

My appointment for an abortion at 28 weeks

By Monica Snyder, Secular Pro-Life On January 12, 2022, I was 27 weeks and 1… Read More

4 hours ago