Abortion

The many reasons “Why the Left is Losing on Abortion”

By Dave Andrusko

As the fiercely competitive race for governor of Virginia between pro-life Glenn Youngkin and pro-abortion Terry McAuliffe enters its final days, McAuliffe is touted his credentials—of how when he was governor, he was a “brick wall” against any pro-life legislation. Is his abortion militancy really going to help McAuliffe?

In light of the abortion cases presently before the Supreme Court, I couldn’t help thinking of the New York Times podcast that aired last year, “Why the Left is losing on abortion.” Michael Barbaro of the Times interviewed Ilyse Hogue, who was President of NARAL Pro-Choice America at the time.

Barbaro occasionally drops the “us” word to let listeners know that he is with the “pro-choice” movement. But to his great credit, he asks Hogue genuinely tough questions.

As a starting point, allow me to combine Hogue’s initial observations with her painfully dramatic presentation of the Abortion Industry as the savior of American democracy. She tries to make the argument that pro-lifers in the states don’t play fair; they bent the rules. So goes so far as to say “one side”—us— is “undemocratic, if not anti-democratic.”

Yowza.

But while Barbaro doesn’t directly contest that melodramatic and inaccurate assessment, in more than one place he says something like this:

You’re saying that conservatives are using the Supreme Court to do what they couldn’t do legislatively. But wouldn’t the right say that that’s what the left also did with Roe v. Wade? It’s just that the right has been doing it better than the left over the past few years?

Hogue, in response, reaches for one of the most ludicrous off all pro-abortion talking points: that pro-lifers and/or those determined that the Supreme Court stop being a super-legislature have tons of money. This, of course, is so preposterous as to be laughable. It is the pro-abortion and the “living Constitution” set that weighs its money by the ton. Barbaro chooses simply to respond by asking “But doesn’t that just mean that the right is doing it more effectively or better?”

A lot of the discussion has to do with whether (in Barbaro’s words) there has been an “overreliance on the security of Roe v. Wade.” In other words, pro-abortionists didn’t put the kind of time and effort into the states they did at the federal level.

(Near the end she tells Barbaro that pro-abortionists are getting their act together at the state level.)

Implicit in most of Hogue’s answers is not only that the pro-abortion side is the protector of democracy, but that it is only dark cabals that account for pro-life victory after pro-life victory at the state level. Check out this self-pitying observation that comes at the very end:

You know, ultimately, if our biggest sin is a deep belief in the power of democracy to come up with good outcomes that benefit the majority of American people in all of our complications, in all of our beautiful diversity, I’ll take that sin. We have to get better at actualizing it, or else we will lose everything we hold dear.

But Hogue’s kind of “democracy” is handed down from on high by the Media Elite, the billionaire pro-abortionist, the leadership of the Democrat party, and the Abortion Industry. Their piles of money and their increasing eagerness to suppress social media is a blatant attempt to stifle genuine democracy which comes from the people. It comes from the bottom up, not dictated top-down.

Barbaro keenly understands that his party stands for abortion on demand. Period. That puts them at odds with the vast majority of the American people.

When Hogue casually talks about passing sweeping federal legislation, Barbaro points out this would be hugely controversial. The kind of legislation they are talking about is a series of radical pro-abortion policies and directives that would wipe out all protective laws at the federal level and hunt down any state legislatures brave enough to pass protective legislation. Killing the Hyde Amendment and “codifying Roe” are only the first steps.

Hogue blithely responds, “I can hardly think of anything less controversial than wanting to codify Roe through federal statute.”

That tone-deaf, strident pro-abortion advocacy is a major explanation of “Why the Left is losing on abortion.”

That and your unfailing determination to protect unborn children and their mothers.

Recent Posts

National Right to Life Mourns the Passing of Former Senator and Presidential Candidate Bob Dole

WASHINGTON – National Right to Life (NRLC) mourns the passing of former Senate Majority Leader… Read More

5 hours ago

Pro-abortionists elevate free association attacks to an art form

By Dave Andrusko When the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s… Read More

5 hours ago

“How sad and tragic that Planned Parenthood and the chemical abortion industry have targeted and deceived young women for their own profit”

Editor’s note. Many pro-life Republican gave floor speeches in response to oral arguments in Dobbs… Read More

5 hours ago

“Instead of prioritizing the abortion industry, we as a Nation should be focused on prioritizing the sanctity of human life”

Editor’s note. Many pro-life Republican gave floor speeches in response to oral arguments in Dobbs… Read More

6 hours ago

The “decades of political organizing by abortion opponents” paying rich dividends for unborn children

 By Dave Andrusko Provocative although incomplete, the headline to Michael Scherer’s story in the Washington Post… Read More

6 hours ago

Fact 15 of 40 Weeks 40 Facts

Here is fact #15. Week 15: The baby is the size of a peach now,… Read More

6 hours ago