pro-abortion

Pro-choice public writing professor deletes source showing embryos have hearts

By Secular Pro-Life. 

Editor’s note. This appeared at Secular Pro-Life and is reposted with permission.

On September 7, 2021, Ms. Magazine published a piece by Carrie Baker titled “Media Repeat Junk Science Behind Abortion Ban Laws: Check the Science — There is No Heartbeat at Six Weeks.” Baker’s not-really-a-heartbeat piece followed the same general format as the many others before it: cite nothing but interviews and replace arguments with ambiguity. 

In her piece, Baker explained that “there is no fetus” at six weeks, meaning at that stage we have an embryo, not a fetus. To back her claim, she linked to this embryology textbook explaining embryonic versus fetal stages of pregnancy. What she appears to have missed, however, is that if you scroll down to the section “Development of the Embryo” it states: 

The heart and major blood vessels begin to develop earlier — by about day 16. The heart begins to pump fluid through blood vessels by day 20, and the first red blood cells appear the next day.

In other words, Baker wrote a piece claiming it is “junk science” to say a 6 week LMP embryo has a heart or heartbeat. She cited obfuscating statements from interviews. But the only firsthand source she linked — the embryology textbook — directly contradicts her. 

I came across her piece and this contradiction on September 21, 2021, at which point I tweeted about it.

Original tweet here.

I checked Twitter later to see if Baker had responded. She had. She blocked the SPL account and removed the link to the embryology textbook from her article. There was no note in the article explaining it had been edited. 

You can see the original piece linking to the embryology textbook by using the Wayback Machine: the link was there on 9/9, 9/11, and 9/14. As of this writing (9/22) it’s gone.

Baker is a professor at Smith College where she teaches courses on, among other things, feminist public writing. She also co-chairs the Ms. Committee of Scholars, which “encourages and trains scholars to write for the public.” Given the inaccuracies and miseducation of her original article and, more egregiously, the furtive way she removed a source that contradicted her conclusions, we can only hope Baker teaches higher standards than she practices.

Recent Posts

Election Day in Virginia Only Six Days Away!

By Olivia Gans Turner, President, Virginia Society for Human Life The candidates are traveling all… Read More

17 hours ago

Pro-abortion New York Times columnist warns Virginia Democrats that race is closer than anyone could have imagined—dead even!

By Dave Andrusko When Michelle Cottle of the New York Times cites chapter and verse… Read More

18 hours ago

Here is fact #9 of 40 Weeks 40 Facts

Week 9: By this point, the tiny one can start sucking its thumb. On that… Read More

18 hours ago

Poll show support widespread support for Texas’ Heartbeat Law

By Dave Andrusko No doubt much to the dismay of the pro-abortion Houston Chronicle, a poll “conducted… Read More

18 hours ago

Unable to move pro-abortion legislation, anti-life forces turn to the endorsing full slate of judicial candidates

By Maria V. Gallagher, Legislative/PAC Director, Pennsylvania Pro-Life Federation Published reports indicate that pro-abortion forces… Read More

18 hours ago

Wisconsin State Assembly Passes Package of Pro-Life Bills

This afternoon, the Wisconsin State Assembly passed four pro-life bills that were previously passed in… Read More

18 hours ago