House approves H.R. 1, would violate First Amendment and suppress free speech

By Laura Echevarria, Director of Communications and Press Secretary

WASHINGTON — Voting 220-210, with no Republican support, the House of Representatives Wednesday approved H.R. 1, the so-called “For the People Act of 2021.”

The purpose of H.R. 1 is to discourage, as much as possible, disfavored groups (such as the National Right to Life Committee) from communicating with supporters about officeholders. This bill would expose citizens who support such efforts to harassment and intimidation, and it would smother organizations in multiple, burdensome layers of record keeping and reporting requirements—all backed by the threat of civil and criminal sanctions.

“This bill is nothing more than a thinly-disguised attempt to secure power by pro-abortion Democrats,” said Carol Tobias, president of National Right to Life. “Democrat leaders are happy to violate the First Amendment and penalize Americans and their right to free speech if it means that they can silence opposing voices.”

Enactment of H.R. 1 would not be a curb on corruption but is itself a type of corruption. 

The bill is an abuse of the lawmaking power, where incumbent lawmakers will be able to employ the threat of criminal sanctions, among other deterrents, to reduce private speech regarding the actions of the lawmakers themselves. The bill would also codify a vague and expansive definition of “the functional equivalent of express advocacy,” that applies to communications which “when taken as a whole, it can be interpreted by a reasonable person only as advocating the election or defeat of a candidate for election for Federal office.”

“There is little that an organization could say by way of commentary on the votes or positions taken by an incumbent member of Congress that would not fall within H.R. 1’s expansive definition of ‘express advocacy,’” said Jennifer Popik, J.D, director of Federal Legislation for National Right to Life. “It is paramount that organizations like National Right to Life are able to inform our grassroots supporters about the votes or positions of represented officials without being subject to harassment.”

The bill also would destroy the bipartisan composition of the Federal Election Commission (FEC) by eliminating a commissioner—upsetting the current balance. The changes to the FEC would significantly increase the likelihood that the agency’s decisions would be politically motivated.

“H.R. 1 is pernicious, unprincipled, and constitutionally defective legislation,” said Tobias. “This legislation is a blatant political attack on First Amendment rights and on the rights of National Right to Life, our state affiliates, our members, and donors.”

Recent Posts

National Right to Life Mourns the Passing of Former Senator and Presidential Candidate Bob Dole

WASHINGTON – National Right to Life (NRLC) mourns the passing of former Senate Majority Leader… Read More

5 hours ago

Pro-abortionists elevate free association attacks to an art form

By Dave Andrusko When the Supreme Court heard Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization last… Read More

5 hours ago

“How sad and tragic that Planned Parenthood and the chemical abortion industry have targeted and deceived young women for their own profit”

Editor’s note. Many pro-life Republican gave floor speeches in response to oral arguments in Dobbs… Read More

5 hours ago

“Instead of prioritizing the abortion industry, we as a Nation should be focused on prioritizing the sanctity of human life”

Editor’s note. Many pro-life Republican gave floor speeches in response to oral arguments in Dobbs… Read More

5 hours ago

The “decades of political organizing by abortion opponents” paying rich dividends for unborn children

 By Dave Andrusko Provocative although incomplete, the headline to Michael Scherer’s story in the Washington Post… Read More

5 hours ago

Fact 15 of 40 Weeks 40 Facts

Here is fact #15. Week 15: The baby is the size of a peach now,… Read More

5 hours ago