By Tim Graham
“Independent fact checkers” like Glenn Kessler at The Washington Post love counting up when Donald Trump repeats something he flagged as False. So what happens when fact-checkers keep repeating their own canards? See PolitiFact during President Trump’s rally in North Carolina on Monday night. They can’t stand when Trump mocks the Democrats as radical on abortion, like in this passage:
PRESIDENT TRUMP: Virtually every top Democrat also now supports late-term abortion. [Booing] Ripping babies straight from the mother’s womb, right up to the moment of birth. [Booing] And if you look at Virginia, the governor of Virginia, he was even talking about essentially, you would say an execution. He was talking after the baby is born, the doctor will talk to the mother and they’ll make a decision as to whether or not that baby lives. This is a radical Democrat idea! That’s why I’ve asked Congress to prohibit extreme late-term abortion because Republicans believe that every child is a sacred gift from God.
PolitiFact touted its own cockamamie ruling from February on Twitter:
Trump is accurately summarizing what Northam awkwardly said back then, that there was a right to choose after birth:
It’s done in cases where there may be severe deformities. There may be a fetus that’s nonviable. So, in this particular example, if a mother is in labor, I can tell you exactly what would happen. The infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desired, and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother.
We noted back then that there’s no definitive data on how many late-term abortions are for babies with severe deformities. The Congressional Research Service’s lead investigator on this matter estimated “abortions for fetal anomaly ‘make up a small minority of later abortion’ and that those for life endangerment are even harder to characterize.”
In other words, at best, the picture of late-term abortions is too blurry to make precise “fact checking” verdicts. But they unpack the bluster and fire the Truth-o-Meter at the president.
Editor’s note. This is excerpted from a post at Newsbusters and is reposted with permission.