By Dave Andrusko
It was 35 years ago today that pro-abortion Walter Mondale, the presumptive Democrat presidential nominee, announced he had chosen “personally opposed” New York Congresswoman Geraldine Ferraro to be his vice presidential running mate.
For Democrats, “personally opposed” would morph (courtesy of “Slick Willie” President Clinton) into “safe, legal and rare.”
Nowadays, pro-abortion Democrats tout the wonderfulness of abortion. It’s not a “tragic [but necessary] decision,” but rather a kind of rite of passage by which women prove they are equal to men by….By what? By killing their own unborn children. Welcome to today’s Democratic Party whose death platform has expanded to include babies who survive abortions.
Quite different in 1984. When Walter Mondale asked Ferraro to help him take on the incumbent pro-life team of Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush, she became the first woman nominated to be on the presidential ticket of a major political party.
Her appeal to Mr. Mondale? ”She’s a woman, she’s ethnic [Italian], she’s Catholic,” said one adviser to Mr. Mondale, as reported by the New York Times. ”We have broken the barrier. She will energize, not just women, but a lot of men who have fallen away from the Democrats.” That analysis proved to be 180 degrees off.
Both Ferraro and Mondale, a former United States Senator and Jimmy Carter’s vice president, were 100% pro-abortion. Ferraro was an activist leader in Congress.
Ferraro was chosen to be on the ticket for three reasons.
First, Mondale’s campaign was in utter disarray. They hoped Ferraro could be packaged as a “personal pro-life but…” His campaign convinced itself that she could bring back into the Democratic fold those many pro-life Catholics who voted for President Reagan in 1980.
Second, in the same vein, they hoped to exploit the “gender gap”: early polling showed more women supporting Mondale than Reagan.
Third, the National Organization for Women (NOW), in those days a genuine force, threatened a floor fight at the convention if Mondale did not choose a woman. Mondale settled on the Queens, New York, Congresswoman.
Ferraro’s candidacy imploded over a host of questions that arose very quickly after she was selected. But on the abortion issue, the major media—much, much more influential in those pre-radio talk show, pre-Internet days—tried assiduously to portray her as almost reluctantly “pro-choice.”
The truth was wholly and completely otherwise, as even the most cursory review of her record fairly screamed out. There were 14 key votes on abortion while she was in Congress prior to her nomination. She was on the wrong side on all 14. She was a co-sponsor of legislation that would have required federal funding of abortion on demand under Medicaid, the Department of Defense, and a number of other federal programs.
She voted against an amendment to prohibit federal funding of harmful medical experimentation on living unborn children who are intended for abortion, or who survived abortion. She voted against an amendment to prevent the denial of routine medical treatment, food or water to babies born with handicaps. In those days the ERA was a hot topic. Ferraro refused to make the ERA abortion-neutral.
When she died in 2011, one obituary in the Los Angeles Times explained her “transformation” from a “small-c conservative to a liberal” and supporter of abortion to her work as a prosecutor in the special victims’ bureau. “You can force a person to have a child, but you can’t make the person love that child,” she was quoted as saying.
Here are three other quotes which paint a fuller picture of her belief that it was cheaper to abort. Ferraro enthusiastically supported federal funding of abortion. In a June 27, 1979, speech to the House of Representatives, she said, “The cost of putting an unwanted child through the [criminal justice] system far outweighs the costs of these [abortion procedures].”
In an interview that appeared in Ms. Magazine in January 1979, Ferraro added, “It’s a simple matter of economics. Unwanted children so often end up in the criminal justice system as offenders or as persons in need of supervision, and it are very expensive to take care of them.”
In a tape-recorded talk given to a pro-abortion conference in New York in 1983, Ferrari said, “I also know that if either one of my girls [then ages 21 and 16] came to me and said, ‘Mom, I’m pregnant, and I’m not gonna have that baby,’ I would say, ‘Here’s the money. Please go see a doctor.’ And what I say to everyone else is, if I would do that for myself for my daughters, how can I say to a poor woman, ‘You don’t have that right to make a choice’?”
Ferraro was a close ally of the militantly pro-abortion group, then known as “Catholics for a Free Choice.” She also wrote the introduction for a booklet the group produced, a guide for how ‘pro-choice’ Catholics could finesse their support for abortion.
There is much more that could be said. Suffice it to observe that on November 6, 1984, the pro-life team of Reagan/ Bush won 49 states, carrying even Ferraro’s congressional district, and 55% of the female vote.