This Week on Pro-Life Perspective: Dealing With Media Inaccuracies, Part Three

By Dave Andrusko

NRLC President Carol Tobias

Today National Right to Life President and Pro-Life Perspective host Carol Tobias talks thoughtfully about media bias and its impact on the Right to Life Movement as part of her week-long series on “Dealing with Media Inaccuracies.” Today’s program, as are all five this week, can be heard at www.prolifeperspective.com.

Mrs. Tobias offers a laundry list of helpful suggestions, but none more important than #1. Of course there will be many times the pro-life side is not represented—or misrepresented. But “complaining won’t help.”

Instead, she advises working with your local media. And if making that personal contact proves difficult, producing a steady stream of accurate, informative letters to the editor can establish your credentials. In some cases, Mrs. Tobias explains, that can result in a request or an opposing “op-ed.”

When it comes to explaining inaccuracies, if it is not the reflection of an overt pro-abortion bias, what is it? The reporter may know virtually nothing about abortion or pro-lifers. One example is that a reporter will write about what they see as a newly discussed opposition to euthanasia among “anti-abortionists” when the truth is the Movement has opposed euthanasia from its very earliest days.

Other errors creep in because the reporter may be taking his/her cues from old stories that unfairly focus on extremists who claim to be “pro-life.” Mrs. Tobias also talks about “newsroom mishaps” where a copy editor makes change in the story after the reporter has filed their account.

There is a lot more to listen to today at www.prolifeperspective.com. After you listen to the broadcast be sure to share the address through your social contacts.

Your feedback is so very important to improving National Right to Life News Today. Please send your comments to daveandrusko@gmail.com. If you like, join those who are following me on Twitter at http://twitter.com/daveha