By Dave Andrusko
I happened across a trail of responses to a letter to the editor, although I could never locate the original that generated the massive response. There were literally thousands!
While you could categorize the message in many, many ways what I found most compelling were the rival narratives that threaded their way through so many answers. (This is not the occasion to rebut but to compare.)
On the pro-abortion side I read a message that leavened personal assaults (pro-lifers either hate pregnant women or are indifferent) with a heavy dose of defiant in your face I-will-do-what-I-want (WHAT is done cannot be “judged”), mixed and blended with (for lack of a better word) “sizeism.” In other words, abortion is the exercise of power over which no one else should be able to say anything—and besides, whatever it is that is being disposed of is so small and “unformed“ that it like being upset that a grain of rice is being dropped down a garbage disposal unit.
On the pro-life side is a recognition that there ARE two parties involved (actually many more—grandparents, fathers, siblings, etc.); that we have an obligation (a four-letter word to pro-abortionists) to the child we have created, whether we WISH to assume it or not; that we are the poorer as individuals and as a culture when we obliterate unborn children because their existence is untimely/a burden; and that the “private” exercise of lethal force on an innocent unborn child is no more private than beating a one-year-old to death who is just as dependent as the unborn child and still a long, long ways from being fully “formed.”
Or maybe it can be reduced to this.
One side says to their conscience, “Be quiet!” The other says, “I’m listening, what can I do?”
Personally, I am glad to be on the side that says, “What can I do?”
Your feedback is important to improving National Right to Life News Today. Please send your comments to email@example.com. If you like, join those who are following me on Twitter at http://twitter.com/daveha