Tag Archives: abortion debate
“There Was a Life That Had to Be Cared For”
Editor’s note. This first ran in the December 2006 edition of National Right to Life News. I have written hundreds of editorials; this is among my all-time favorites and is part of our “Roe at 40” series. I hope you
Re: “Naughty or Nice?”
By Paul Ranalli, MD FRCPC Editor’s Note. This is a letter to the editor of the Canadian “Medical Post.” The Morgentaler decision referenced by Dr. Ranelli is a January 28, 1988, decision by the Canadian Supreme Court that struck all
The abortion debate is happening in Canada
By Patricia Maloney Columnist Paul Russell devotes his entire column Saturday in the National Post, “The Week in Letters,” to the abortion debate in Canada under the headline, “Readers agree: It’s time Canada had an abortion law.” He also publishes
A real debate over abortion in Canada: no longer unthinkable
By Dave Andrusko Imagine you are the Canadian Abortion Establishment so entrenched it makes your America counterparts look like they are on the run. (Come to think of it, there are hints of that, but that’s another story.) There is
Unborn Are Human Life: “So What?”
By Wesley J. Smith The pro choice side of the abortion debate have always been profoundly dishonest, claiming that the unborn are not really “human.” (Well, they’re not Martians. They’re not chopped liver.) But it was deemed a necessary lie
Edge of precipice
Editor’s note. This comes from the European Life Network. A letter in the Independent newspaper on January 24 titled, “Edge of precipice” looks at the importance of language in the abortion debate and how it has been abused to further
Pro-lifers pulling ahead in the battle over abortion
Efforts to save lives continue By Pam Fichter, President Missouri Right to Life Editor’s note. This first appeared in The Columbia Daily Tribune. Thirty-nine years ago, the U.S. Supreme Court wiped from the books of all 50 states every law
Any Limitation on Abortion? Ever? The Debate Continues
By Dave Andrusko Imagine writing a piece in which you lay out pro-abortion extremism taken to the nth degree. You expect widespread (or at least lots of) confirmation that there have to be SOME limits on abortion, only to discover