By Dave Andrusko

Doctor-prescribed suicide has been affirmatively legalized in only two states, in spite of numerous ballot initiatives, court challenges, and well over one hundred legislative efforts. This is so because coalitions of enormous depth and breadth have sprung up in opposition.

A major “hurtle” for doctor-prescribed suicide proponents has been the near universal opposition of state medical associations. Last year the Massachusetts Medical Society’s House of Delegates voted overwhelmingly to retain the Society’s long-standing opposition to physician assisted suicide.

“Both the Massachusetts Medical Society and the Hospice and Palliative Care Federation of Massachusetts oppose Ballot Question 2, which would legalize and encourage doctor-prescribed suicide,” Anne Fox, President of Massachusetts Citizens for Life, told NRL News Today. “These are the people who really know about caring for dying patients.  As the general public learns more about this question, people are joining in opposition.”

The following statement of opposition to “Question 2” was issued September 14 by Massachusetts Medical Society

The Massachusetts Medical Society opposes this ballot question.

On November 6, Massachusetts voters will have the opportunity to vote on Question 2, “Prescribing Medication to End Life.”

We are opposed to Question 2 for these reasons:

• The proposed safeguards against abuse are insufficient. Enforcement provisions, investigation authority, oversight, or data verification are not included in the act. A witness to the patient’s signed request could also be an heir.
• Assisted suicide is not necessary to improve the quality of life at the end of life. Current law gives every patient the right to refuse lifesaving treatment, and to have adequate pain relief, including hospice and palliative sedation.
• Predicting the end of life within six months is difficult; sometimes the prediction is not accurate. From time to time, patients expected to be within months of their death have gone on to live many more months — or years. In one study, 17 percent of patients outlived their prognosis.
• Doctors should not participate in assisted suicide. The chief policy making body of the Massachusetts Medical Society has voted to oppose physician assisted suicide.

The Massachusetts Medical Society has reaffirmed its commitment to provide physicians treating terminally ill patients with the ethical, medical, social, and legal education, training, and resources to enable them to contribute to the comfort and dignity of the patient and the patient’s family.

Lynda M. Young, MD, MMS past president, testified about the MMS policy at a hearing of the House Judiciary Committee on March 6, 2012:

“Allowing physicians to participate in assisted suicide would cause more harm than good. Physician assisted suicide is fundamentally incompatible with the physician’s role as healer. “Instead of participating in assisted suicide, physicians must aggressively respond to the needs of patients at the end of life. …  Patients must continue to receive emotional support, comfort care, adequate pain control, respect for patient autonomy, and good communication.”

Editor’s note. You can find this declaration at http://www.massmed.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=MMS_Advocacy&TEMPLATE=/CM/HTMLDisplay.cfm&CONTENTID=76836

Your feedback is very important to improving National Right to Life News Today. Please send your comments to daveandrusko@gmail.com. If you like, join those who are following me on Twitter at http://twitter.com/daveha