U.S. House Passes Two More
Pro-Life Measures
WASHINGTON (June 16,
2011)—The Republican-controlled U.S. House of Representatives
approved two important pro-life measures, strongly backed by the
National Right to Life Committee, during May.
Both measures face uphill
fights in the U.S. Senate, which Democrats currently control by a
53-47 majority. On the most recent abortion-related vote in the
Senate, an April 14 roll call on a bill to cut off federal funds for
the Planned Parenthood Federation of America, the pro-life side lost
42-58 (see April/May NRL News, page 21).
No Taxpayer Funding for
Abortion Act
On May 4, the House approved
a major NRLC priority, the No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act
(H.R. 3), by a vote of 251 to 175.
Every Republican House
member who was present—235 lawmakers—voted in favor of the bill,
joined by 16 Democrats. Every one of the 175 negative votes was cast
by a Democrat.
(The House roll call on H.R.
3 appears on pages 24-26 of this edition, in vote column no. 1.)
Two days before the House
took up the bill, the White House issued a statement attacking the
bill, th
Read
more...
An Interview with Mary
Spaulding Balch
Understanding Why Pro-Lifers Were So Successful
at the State Level in 2011
By Dave Andrusko
A conversation with Mary
Spaulding Balch, director of National Right to Life’s Department of
State Legislation, is always equal parts enthusiasm, education, and
inside information. Add to the mix the excitement generated by the
NRL Convention in Florida—which was only eight days away when we
talked—and I knew NRL News readers were in for a treat.
The 2011 legislative session
was very productive, Balch explained. Before we went through the
high points, I asked her what explains the undeniable progress.
“The
country is becoming more pro-life,” Balch said. “And that is
reflected in elections; a great many pro-lifers were added last
November, which changed the substance and the chemistry in many
state legislatures.”
I asked for specifics. “It’s
not just opinion polls, which are trending our way,” she said. “And
it’s not just that young people, in general, are pro-life, which
they clearly are.”
Read more...
-
The “New Normal”:
A More Pro-Life America and Falling Obama Approval Ratings
-
National Right to Life News
Today: Your Online Pro-Life Newspaper
-
Jack Kevorkian: RIP
-
Sarah Palin: “Every Child Is
Created Special,
with Awesome Purpose and Amazing Potential”
-
Judge Hears Final Arguments in
Indiana Funding Law
-
National Right to Life
Announces Life and Leadership Camp Initiative
-
The First Place Winners
in the National Right to Life Pro-Life Essay Contest
-
Tracing the State and Local Governmental Sources of Planned
Parenthood’s Funding
-
Pro-Abortion Judicial Nominee Goodwin Liu Blocked in Senate on
Near Party-Line Vote
-
Pennsylvania Senate Passes Abortion Clinic Regulation Bill
-
Pro-Life Tim Tebow Has New Book, Through My Eyes
-
National Right to Life Educational Trust Fund Encourages the
Expansion of Corporate Campaign Giving Opportunities
-
National Right to Life Interns: Fearless, Undaunted, Energetic,
Passionate, and Devoted
-
The Pro-Life Advantage for Candidates Continues, Including among
Independents
-
Republican Presidential Candidates Stand Firmly Pro-Life in New
Hampshire Debate
-
New Analysis of Maternal Mortality Confirms Health Care, Not
Abortion, Key Factor in Saving Lives
-
Recent UN Procedures Undermine Sovereignty and Transparency,
Worry Pro-Life/Pro-Family Coalition
-
American Health Care Leads the World
-
Gallup Survey Finds 61% Opposed to Most or All Abortions,
Majority Believes that Abortion is Morally Wrong
-
“Interview
with an Unborn Child”: An Astoundingly Powerful Video
-
Autos for Life Needs Your Vehicles This Summer!
-
The Language of Abortion
-
New Test Poses Even Greater Dangers for Unborn Babies with
Disabilities
-
“QR
Codes”: A Wonderfully Creative Way to Quickly Access Pro-Life
Educational Materials
|
From the President
 |
|
Carol Tobias |
WHAT ONE PERSON CAN DO
BY Carol Tobias
What can one person do?
Because of Charlie Simpson, survivors of last year’s earthquake in
Haiti received substantial help from UNICEF. Charlie, a seven-year
old boy in London, decided he wanted to help the earthquake victims.
He wrote on a fundraising website that he was going to ride his
bicycle for eight kilometers (five miles) around the local park, and
asked people to sponsor his efforts. Hoping he could raise 500 euros,
Charlie succeeded in raising more than 200,000 euros, or almost
$300,000! The money was used to provide food, water, and sanitation
in Haiti.
What can one person do? Ask
the widows and children of India who lived because a Baptist
missionary decided to make a difference. In his last sermon before
leaving England, William Carey stated, “Expect great things from
God! Attempt great things for God.”
When Carey arrived in India
in 1793, infant sacrifices were common. The culture placed a low
value on females—often female babies were smothered at birth, and
pressure was put on widows to be burned alive on their husbands’
funeral pyre. Euthanasia was practiced as the sick and elderly were
left by the riverside—exposed to extreme temperatures, crocodiles,
or insects. Lepers were often burned alive.
William Carey spent 41 years
in India campaigning for human rights along with his missionary
work. By the time he died in 1834, the British ruling government had
outlawed infanticide, as well as widow and leper burning.
What can one person do?
Read
Carol Tobias's Entire Column
NRL News
Archive
2011
January 2011
February/March 2011
April/May 2011
June/July 2011
2010
January
2010
February/March 2010
April/May 2010
June/July 2010
August/September 2010
October 2010
November/December 2010
2009
NRL News 2009 Subject Index
January 2009
February 2009
March 2009
April 2009
May 2009
June 2009
July/August 2009
September 2009
October 2009
November/December
2009
2008
NRL News 2008 Subject Index
January 2008
February
2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July/August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November/December 2008
2007
NRL News
2007 Subject Index
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August
2007
September
2007
October 2007
December 2007
2006
NRL News 2006 Subject Index
January 2006
February
2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September
2006
October
2006
November 2006
December
2006
2005
NRL News
2005
Subject Index
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September
2005
October
2005
November
2005
December 2005
2004
NRL News
2004
Subject Index
January
2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January
2003
February 2003
March 2003
April 2003
May 2003
June 2003
July 2003
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003
2002
NRL News 2002 Subject Index
January
2002
February 2002
March 2002
April 2002
May 2002
June 2002
July 2002
August 2002
September 2002
October 2002
November 2002
December 2002
2001
NRL News
2001
Subject Index
January
2001
February 2001
March 2001
April 2001
May 2001
June 2001
July 2001
August 2001
September 2001
October 2001
November 2001
December 2001
January 2000
February 2000
March 2000
April 2000
May 2000
June 2000
July 2000
August 2000
September 2000
October 2000
December 2000
1999
NRL News
1999
Subject Index
January 22, 1999
February 19, 1999
March 15, 1999
April 8, 1999
May 11, 1999
June 10, 1999
July 6, 1999
August 10, 1999
September 14, 1999
October 12, 1999
November 1999
December 1999
1998
NRL News
1998 Subject Index
January 1998
February 11, 1998
March 11, 1998
April 14, 1998
May 7, 1998
July 8, 1998
June 9, 1998
August 12, 1998
September 28, 1998
October 12, 1998
November 17, 1998
December 10, 1998
December 9, 1997
Subject Indexes for 1990
- 1996
NRL News
1996
Subject Index
NRL News
1995
Subject Index
NRL News
1994
Subject Index
NRL News
1993
Subject Index
NRL News
1992
Subject Index
NRL News
1991
Subject Index
NRL News
1990
Subject Index |